Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research

official impact factor 1.92

Open Access Highly Access Research

Hypersensitivity reactions to anticancer agents: Data mining of the public version of the FDA adverse event reporting system, AERS

Kaori Kadoyama1, Akiko Kuwahara2, Motohiro Yamamori2, JB Brown1, Toshiyuki Sakaeda1* and Yasushi Okuno1,3*

Author Affiliations

1 Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan

2 School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Mukogawa Women's University, Nishinomiya 663-8179, Japan

3 Kyoto Constella Technologies Co Ltd., Kyoto 604-8156, Japan

For all author emails, please log on.

Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research 2011, 30:93 doi:10.1186/1756-9966-30-93

Published: 5 October 2011

Abstract

Background

Previously, adverse event reports (AERs) submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) database were reviewed to confirm platinum agent-associated hypersensitivity reactions. The present study was performed to confirm whether the database could suggest the hypersensitivity reactions caused by anticancer agents, paclitaxel, docetaxel, procarbazine, asparaginase, teniposide, and etoposide.

Methods

After a revision of arbitrary drug names and the deletion of duplicated submissions, AERs involving candidate agents were analyzed. The National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 was applied to evaluate the susceptibility to hypersensitivity reactions, and standardized official pharmacovigilance tools were used for quantitative detection of signals, i.e., drug-associated adverse events, including the proportional reporting ratio, the reporting odds ratio, the information component given by a Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and the empirical Bayes geometric mean.

Results

Based on 1,644,220 AERs from 2004 to 2009, the signals were detected for paclitaxel-associated mild, severe, and lethal hypersensitivity reactions, and docetaxel-associated lethal reactions. However, the total number of adverse events occurring with procarbazine, asparaginase, teniposide, or etoposide was not large enough to detect signals.

Conclusions

The FDA's adverse event reporting system, AERS, and the data mining methods used herein are useful for confirming drug-associated adverse events, but the number of co-occurrences is an important factor in signal detection.